<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The New American Patriot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theampat.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theampat.com</link>
	<description>“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 03:08:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The NRA? I Warned You&#8230; by TPaine</title>
		<link>http://www.theampat.com/?p=1633#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>TPaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 03:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theampat.com/?p=1633#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>Look, it&#039;s kinda simple, by the NRA&#039;s standards: vote for (and I won&#039;t say &#039;Romney&#039; yet because he is not the nominee and he is not a shoo-in) the Republican candidate in order to defeat Obama. However, the NRA is not the friend to gun-owners that they want you to believe they are. Try this one article (http://www.ammoland.com/2010/05/03/open-letter-to-ted-nugent/#axzz1uzx1Vl8D) on for size and then do your own research. 

Do you think the NRA is so powerful that they can get someone elected? I don&#039;t think so, but that&#039;s what they want you to believe. If you want to belong to an organization that truly supports your individual 2nd Amendment rights, join the GOA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, it&#8217;s kinda simple, by the NRA&#8217;s standards: vote for (and I won&#8217;t say &#8216;Romney&#8217; yet because he is not the nominee and he is not a shoo-in) the Republican candidate in order to defeat Obama. However, the NRA is not the friend to gun-owners that they want you to believe they are. Try this one article (<a href="http://www.ammoland.com/2010/05/03/open-letter-to-ted-nugent/#axzz1uzx1Vl8D" rel="nofollow">http://www.ammoland.com/2010/05/03/open-letter-to-ted-nugent/#axzz1uzx1Vl8D</a>) on for size and then do your own research. </p>
<p>Do you think the NRA is so powerful that they can get someone elected? I don&#8217;t think so, but that&#8217;s what they want you to believe. If you want to belong to an organization that truly supports your individual 2nd Amendment rights, join the GOA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Voting in the U.S. May Not Matter Anymore, Anyway! by TPaine</title>
		<link>http://www.theampat.com/?p=1600#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>TPaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 02:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theampat.com/?p=1600#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>While I will not utterly reject this Snopes piece, it has been proven that Snopes cannot be trusted when it comes to left-wing politics. I would advise anyone using Snopes to double-check everything, like http://www.factcheck.org/  To put it mildly. I do not trust Snopes with anything having to do with politics, period!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I will not utterly reject this Snopes piece, it has been proven that Snopes cannot be trusted when it comes to left-wing politics. I would advise anyone using Snopes to double-check everything, like <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.factcheck.org/</a>  To put it mildly. I do not trust Snopes with anything having to do with politics, period!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Voting in the U.S. May Not Matter Anymore, Anyway! by justin</title>
		<link>http://www.theampat.com/?p=1600#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 01:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theampat.com/?p=1600#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/scytl.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/scytl.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/scytl.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The NRA? I Warned You&#8230; by justin</title>
		<link>http://www.theampat.com/?p=1633#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theampat.com/?p=1633#comment-1437</guid>
		<description>Hello, First I want to say I really like your blog. Second is a question about this post or issue rather. If the NRA isn&#039;t helping by making sure that Obama doesn&#039;t get back in what shoudl they be doing? I mean we dont have a good option. It&#039;s either Obama or Romney and if the NRA doesn&#039;t back Romney doesn&#039;t that mean more votes for Obama? Justs curious becuase I dont want either one of them but I&#039;ve put my faith in the NRA. What&#039;s the GOA going to do? Thanks for your time. Justin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, First I want to say I really like your blog. Second is a question about this post or issue rather. If the NRA isn&#8217;t helping by making sure that Obama doesn&#8217;t get back in what shoudl they be doing? I mean we dont have a good option. It&#8217;s either Obama or Romney and if the NRA doesn&#8217;t back Romney doesn&#8217;t that mean more votes for Obama? Justs curious becuase I dont want either one of them but I&#8217;ve put my faith in the NRA. What&#8217;s the GOA going to do? Thanks for your time. Justin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The IRS Has No Sense of Humor by TPaine</title>
		<link>http://www.theampat.com/?p=1389#comment-1404</link>
		<dc:creator>TPaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 20:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theampat.com/?p=1389#comment-1404</guid>
		<description>So the government knows just how many illegals are in this country, using fraudulent Social Security numbers? Where do these figures come from? Oh, the Social Security Administration. I see. Now tell me how many of these illegals take that money back out in education, housing and health expenses. About $1B in fraudulent claims I am one of those &quot;restrictionists are mostly older or retired whites from longtime American families&quot; who supposedly benefit from all of these illegals paying into the system. And I would be more than happy to see every one of those illegals sent back to where-ever they came from, and out of their fraudulent incomes and fraudulent SS payments.

You can say &quot;thank you&quot; all you want, but I&#039;m not about to thank law-breakers for breaking the laws. How many other law-breakers are contributing to society that we don&#039;t know about? Probably a lot. It&#039;s amazing how some people can rationalize criminal activities to make their point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the government knows just how many illegals are in this country, using fraudulent Social Security numbers? Where do these figures come from? Oh, the Social Security Administration. I see. Now tell me how many of these illegals take that money back out in education, housing and health expenses. About $1B in fraudulent claims I am one of those &#8220;restrictionists are mostly older or retired whites from longtime American families&#8221; who supposedly benefit from all of these illegals paying into the system. And I would be more than happy to see every one of those illegals sent back to where-ever they came from, and out of their fraudulent incomes and fraudulent SS payments.</p>
<p>You can say &#8220;thank you&#8221; all you want, but I&#8217;m not about to thank law-breakers for breaking the laws. How many other law-breakers are contributing to society that we don&#8217;t know about? Probably a lot. It&#8217;s amazing how some people can rationalize criminal activities to make their point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The IRS Has No Sense of Humor by r.a.</title>
		<link>http://www.theampat.com/?p=1389#comment-1398</link>
		<dc:creator>r.a.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theampat.com/?p=1389#comment-1398</guid>
		<description>Funny that if you actually look at the statistics, you get the opposite picture: &quot;illegal&quot; immigrants are actually boosting the revenue of social security.

How illegal immigrants are helping Social Security
By Edward Schumacher-Matos
Friday, September 3, 2010;

The contributions by unauthorized immigrants to Social Security -- essentially, to the retirement income of everyday Americans -- are much larger than previously known, raising questions about the efforts in many states and among Republicans in Congress to force these workers out.

In response to a research inquiry for a book I am writing on the economics of immigration, Stephen C. Goss, the chief actuary of the Social Security Administration and someone who enjoys bipartisan support for his straightforwardness, said that by 2007, the Social Security trust fund had received a net benefit of somewhere between $120 billion and $240 billion from unauthorized immigrants.

That represented an astounding 5.4 percent to 10.7 percent of the trust fund&#039;s total assets of $2.24 trillion that year. The cumulative contribution is surely higher now. Unauthorized immigrants paid a net contribution of $12 billion in 2007 alone, Goss said.

Previous estimates circulating publicly and in Congress had placed the annual contributions at roughly half of Goss&#039;s 2007 figure and listed the cumulative benefit on the order of $50 billion.

The Social Security trust fund faces a solvency crisis that would be even more pressing were it not for these payments.

&quot;If for example we had not had other-than-legal immigrants in the country over the past,&quot; Goss e-mailed me, &quot;then these numbers suggest that we would have entered persistent shortfall of tax revenue to cover [payouts] starting [in] 2009, or six years earlier than estimated under the 2010 Trustees Report.&quot;

Americans are faced with the difficult choice of cutting pensions, delaying the retirement age or raising taxes if we want to maintain the solvency of what has been the centerpiece of social welfare for ordinary Americans since the 1930s.

Legal immigrants are also net contributors to the pensions of the rest of us because they are relatively young as a group. But the benefit we receive from unauthorized immigrants carries special irony. Immigration restrictionists in Arizona, Virginia, Texas and almost every state in the country are pushing bills and local ordinances to force them out by making it difficult to get jobs, rent apartments, send their children to college or drive cars.

The Pew Hispanic Center estimated this week that the number of unauthorized immigrants in the country dropped from a peak of 12 million in March 2007 to 11.1 million in March 2009. The drop is due in part to the recession but also to the hostile atmosphere toward unauthorized immigrants.

The Obama administration isn&#039;t helping much. Barack Obama, like George W. Bush before him, favors legalizing most of the unauthorized. But in making enforcement systems tighter to curtail future illegal immigration, his administration is deporting ever more of the ones already here -- to the tune of 400,000 this year. Yet the administration has resisted pressuring congressional Democrats to craft a legalization bill, in part because of Republican opposition.

Adding to the Social Security irony is that the restrictionists are mostly older or retired whites from longtime American families. The very people, in other words, who benefit most from the Social Security payments by unauthorized immigrants.

The Social Security actuaries estimate that two-thirds of unauthorized immigrant workers, or 5.6 million people, were paying into the system in 2007. Roughly half used a Social Security number tied to an invented name or one that belonged to someone else. Of the rest, many got legal cards when they entered the country under a temporary work visa. They stayed illegally after their visas expired.

About 180,000 unauthorized immigrants received about $1 billion in fraudulent benefits in 2007, Goss said. These benefits are subtracted from the net contribution. Few of the unauthorized workers are likely to receive anything, ever. About the only way they might would be if they were to become legal, and they had paid their withholding taxes using their true names.

The decline in illegal immigration, plus tighter workplace enforcement, means that contributions from the unauthorized will decrease. But as Goss notes, they remain, because of larger families, a positive contributing factor to Social Security solvency.

Somebody ought to say thank you.

Edward Schumacher-Matos is syndicated by the Washington Post Writers Group. His e-mail address is edward.schumachermatos@yahoo.com.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/02/AR2010090202673.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that if you actually look at the statistics, you get the opposite picture: &#8220;illegal&#8221; immigrants are actually boosting the revenue of social security.</p>
<p>How illegal immigrants are helping Social Security<br />
By Edward Schumacher-Matos<br />
Friday, September 3, 2010;</p>
<p>The contributions by unauthorized immigrants to Social Security &#8212; essentially, to the retirement income of everyday Americans &#8212; are much larger than previously known, raising questions about the efforts in many states and among Republicans in Congress to force these workers out.</p>
<p>In response to a research inquiry for a book I am writing on the economics of immigration, Stephen C. Goss, the chief actuary of the Social Security Administration and someone who enjoys bipartisan support for his straightforwardness, said that by 2007, the Social Security trust fund had received a net benefit of somewhere between $120 billion and $240 billion from unauthorized immigrants.</p>
<p>That represented an astounding 5.4 percent to 10.7 percent of the trust fund&#8217;s total assets of $2.24 trillion that year. The cumulative contribution is surely higher now. Unauthorized immigrants paid a net contribution of $12 billion in 2007 alone, Goss said.</p>
<p>Previous estimates circulating publicly and in Congress had placed the annual contributions at roughly half of Goss&#8217;s 2007 figure and listed the cumulative benefit on the order of $50 billion.</p>
<p>The Social Security trust fund faces a solvency crisis that would be even more pressing were it not for these payments.</p>
<p>&#8220;If for example we had not had other-than-legal immigrants in the country over the past,&#8221; Goss e-mailed me, &#8220;then these numbers suggest that we would have entered persistent shortfall of tax revenue to cover [payouts] starting [in] 2009, or six years earlier than estimated under the 2010 Trustees Report.&#8221;</p>
<p>Americans are faced with the difficult choice of cutting pensions, delaying the retirement age or raising taxes if we want to maintain the solvency of what has been the centerpiece of social welfare for ordinary Americans since the 1930s.</p>
<p>Legal immigrants are also net contributors to the pensions of the rest of us because they are relatively young as a group. But the benefit we receive from unauthorized immigrants carries special irony. Immigration restrictionists in Arizona, Virginia, Texas and almost every state in the country are pushing bills and local ordinances to force them out by making it difficult to get jobs, rent apartments, send their children to college or drive cars.</p>
<p>The Pew Hispanic Center estimated this week that the number of unauthorized immigrants in the country dropped from a peak of 12 million in March 2007 to 11.1 million in March 2009. The drop is due in part to the recession but also to the hostile atmosphere toward unauthorized immigrants.</p>
<p>The Obama administration isn&#8217;t helping much. Barack Obama, like George W. Bush before him, favors legalizing most of the unauthorized. But in making enforcement systems tighter to curtail future illegal immigration, his administration is deporting ever more of the ones already here &#8212; to the tune of 400,000 this year. Yet the administration has resisted pressuring congressional Democrats to craft a legalization bill, in part because of Republican opposition.</p>
<p>Adding to the Social Security irony is that the restrictionists are mostly older or retired whites from longtime American families. The very people, in other words, who benefit most from the Social Security payments by unauthorized immigrants.</p>
<p>The Social Security actuaries estimate that two-thirds of unauthorized immigrant workers, or 5.6 million people, were paying into the system in 2007. Roughly half used a Social Security number tied to an invented name or one that belonged to someone else. Of the rest, many got legal cards when they entered the country under a temporary work visa. They stayed illegally after their visas expired.</p>
<p>About 180,000 unauthorized immigrants received about $1 billion in fraudulent benefits in 2007, Goss said. These benefits are subtracted from the net contribution. Few of the unauthorized workers are likely to receive anything, ever. About the only way they might would be if they were to become legal, and they had paid their withholding taxes using their true names.</p>
<p>The decline in illegal immigration, plus tighter workplace enforcement, means that contributions from the unauthorized will decrease. But as Goss notes, they remain, because of larger families, a positive contributing factor to Social Security solvency.</p>
<p>Somebody ought to say thank you.</p>
<p>Edward Schumacher-Matos is syndicated by the Washington Post Writers Group. His e-mail address is <a href="mailto:edward.schumachermatos@yahoo.com">edward.schumachermatos@yahoo.com</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/02/AR2010090202673.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/02/AR2010090202673.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maybe a Line of Hoodie-Wear&#8230; by TPaine</title>
		<link>http://www.theampat.com/?p=1591#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>TPaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theampat.com/?p=1591#comment-1382</guid>
		<description>Too bad you don&#039;t deal in facts instead of listening to the media. I live in the area, and I don&#039;t know all the facts yet. But I do know that Zimmerman was following Martin, and not approaching him. Martin approached Zimmerman and a fight started. Zimmerman was the person crying for help (per an eye-witness) and not Martin, so your &quot;undisputed fact&quot; is crap. The police did not arrest Zimmerman (after detention and over 5 hours of questioning) because they didn&#039;t have enough evidence to charge him with the offense. And the police are there percisely to determine whether or not a law has been broken. 

It is people like you, and the media, who are not lawyers and have no right to decide the guilt or innocence of anyone until the facts come out at a trial, and real lawyers do their work. Unfortunately, Zimmerman has been tried already in the courtroom of publicity and racist foaming at the mouth. &quot;This poor boy&quot; was not the innocent you see pictured on all the stories, either. Zimmerman was beaten by Martin until he pulled his legally concealed weapon and stopped the beating.

And Zimmerman has been cooperating with the investigation from the start, turned himself in when he was officially charged, and has been cooperating ever since. This despite the fact that not only he and his entire family have been getting death threats. Nice people who do things like this. I&#039;m sure you would approve.

And now, he has been released on bail. After being arrested and held, the judge has let him out of jail. I guess this too is terrible in your mind. But you, and all of the media and New Black Panthers and Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, and not the law. So shut up and let the legal system do the work. And if it is determined that Zimmerman did not murder Martin, live with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad you don&#8217;t deal in facts instead of listening to the media. I live in the area, and I don&#8217;t know all the facts yet. But I do know that Zimmerman was following Martin, and not approaching him. Martin approached Zimmerman and a fight started. Zimmerman was the person crying for help (per an eye-witness) and not Martin, so your &#8220;undisputed fact&#8221; is crap. The police did not arrest Zimmerman (after detention and over 5 hours of questioning) because they didn&#8217;t have enough evidence to charge him with the offense. And the police are there percisely to determine whether or not a law has been broken. </p>
<p>It is people like you, and the media, who are not lawyers and have no right to decide the guilt or innocence of anyone until the facts come out at a trial, and real lawyers do their work. Unfortunately, Zimmerman has been tried already in the courtroom of publicity and racist foaming at the mouth. &#8220;This poor boy&#8221; was not the innocent you see pictured on all the stories, either. Zimmerman was beaten by Martin until he pulled his legally concealed weapon and stopped the beating.</p>
<p>And Zimmerman has been cooperating with the investigation from the start, turned himself in when he was officially charged, and has been cooperating ever since. This despite the fact that not only he and his entire family have been getting death threats. Nice people who do things like this. I&#8217;m sure you would approve.</p>
<p>And now, he has been released on bail. After being arrested and held, the judge has let him out of jail. I guess this too is terrible in your mind. But you, and all of the media and New Black Panthers and Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, and not the law. So shut up and let the legal system do the work. And if it is determined that Zimmerman did not murder Martin, live with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maybe a Line of Hoodie-Wear&#8230; by Anderzon</title>
		<link>http://www.theampat.com/?p=1591#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 09:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theampat.com/?p=1591#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>This is ridiculous! A young man has lost his life to an ozorvealeus nosey piece of crap man who didn&#039;t listen to direct orders from law officials! They specifically told him not to peruse this boy! And now he is dead! This poor boy spent the last few minutes of life crying for help! This fact is undisputed!! How dare the police not arrest this man! They are not attorneys! They are not allowed to interpret the law. This story just pisses me off and nearly brings me to tears everytime I hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ridiculous! A young man has lost his life to an ozorvealeus nosey piece of crap man who didn&#8217;t listen to direct orders from law officials! They specifically told him not to peruse this boy! And now he is dead! This poor boy spent the last few minutes of life crying for help! This fact is undisputed!! How dare the police not arrest this man! They are not attorneys! They are not allowed to interpret the law. This story just pisses me off and nearly brings me to tears everytime I hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Race War Starting in Sanford Florida? by TPaine</title>
		<link>http://www.theampat.com/?p=1524#comment-1304</link>
		<dc:creator>TPaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theampat.com/?p=1524#comment-1304</guid>
		<description>Zimmerman didn&#039;t miss. One shot to the chest. Of course, what the MSM is still not telling is that Zimmerman was on the ground, nose broken and face lacerated, begging for help from a witness who yelled at them to break it up and then left to call 9-1-1. And soon enough you&#039;ll hear more about that innocent little boy, who was 6&#039;1&quot; and a high school football player, and who started the fight. Zimmerman might not be entirely innocent, but Treyvon ain&#039;t the cute little tyke the news is playing him up to be.

Let&#039;s let the law sort this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zimmerman didn&#8217;t miss. One shot to the chest. Of course, what the MSM is still not telling is that Zimmerman was on the ground, nose broken and face lacerated, begging for help from a witness who yelled at them to break it up and then left to call 9-1-1. And soon enough you&#8217;ll hear more about that innocent little boy, who was 6&#8217;1&#8243; and a high school football player, and who started the fight. Zimmerman might not be entirely innocent, but Treyvon ain&#8217;t the cute little tyke the news is playing him up to be.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s let the law sort this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Race War Starting in Sanford Florida? by TPaine</title>
		<link>http://www.theampat.com/?p=1524#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>TPaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theampat.com/?p=1524#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>The tide is turning, and it is mainly because of the NBP morons who decided that they&#039;d take the law into their own hands. The police have finally released the info they were holding back (WTF? WHY???), and it appears that little Treyvon isn&#039;t the cute little 11-year-old boy being broadcast in the MSM. Looks like it&#039;s backfiring on the vigilantes. I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tide is turning, and it is mainly because of the NBP morons who decided that they&#8217;d take the law into their own hands. The police have finally released the info they were holding back (WTF? WHY???), and it appears that little Treyvon isn&#8217;t the cute little 11-year-old boy being broadcast in the MSM. Looks like it&#8217;s backfiring on the vigilantes. I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

